04/20/2011
I DON'T CARE ANYMORE V
Back in November 2009, I have written about the decision Obama had to make about sending troops to Afghanistan, I had told you why Obama had no other choice but to keep the war going because our economy depended on continuing the charade that if we don't fight them there we will have to fight them here.
My question has always been, how many Afghans are actually able to come to the US and carry out a mission in the US. Please pay attention to the fact that we are having trouble recruiting and training them just for their own military and the police forces. Most them are illiterate, and functioning just about the mental capacity of an eight year old in the US, a statement I had asked the Guantanamo commander in 2008 to refute on the Jim Bohanan show.
The problem is that we need these wars, to keep our economy going to provide jobs for the people at Boeing, Lockheed Martin, at Dyna Corp, at BlackWater (no called XE) at CSC, and of course at KBR and Halliburton.
Once again one must connect the dots, as I mentioned previously our economy needs the wars to keep going, our wars are fought with borrowed money, and we borrow the money from the same banks that we are loaning money to, to keep them afloat, it does get kinda confusing does it not.
Yesterday I posted a comment on an article on "truth out" and the comment was this "
Mohammed N. Razavi Note, we need to "create" terrorists to control our own population, and need the war to support our economy and transfer wealth from the US government to corporations, banks and private individuals. If you do not understand the connection you need to study up.16 hours ago · · 1 person"
Now I know it sounds unlikely that the US government will create terrorists on purpose, but what if the result of our actions is still the same, on purpose or not. WE NEED WARS. For my younger readers, under Reagan the US government decided that the parts of the US defense could be privatized. When I joined the army in 1976, everyone on base , just about, was in uniform, we did have some civilians but mostly guys in the army, from gate guards to picking up trash to kitchen duty to painting building, and more all was done the GIs, heck we even cut the grass around the BOQ.
Then things started to change, there were contractors in supply, in kitchen and in the motor pools and on and on, millions of civilians now work for the military doing the jobs the GIs once did, ( I have explained else where how it reflect on the civilian employment numbers etc). Now more and more complicated tasks are assigned to civilians ( who make a lot more money than the GIs.
Here in lies the big problem, if we do not have wars, all these people are unemployed and also the corporations who make profits off this will go out of business if we do not have a mission for them. Like I said earlier it all started under Reagan, and of course continued under under Bush 41.
http://www.defense.gov/specials/secdef_histories/bios/cheney.htm
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/20/in-afghanistan-house-speaker-john-boehner-assails-pullout-plan/
LIFE IS A GAME OF CONNECT THE DOTS, IF YOU DON'T CONNECT ALL THE DOTS OR DON'T CONNECT THEM IN THE RIGHT ORDER YOU NEVER GET THE PICTURE
I DON'T CARE ANYMORE V
Back in November 2009, I have written about the decision Obama had to make about sending troops to Afghanistan, I had told you why Obama had no other choice but to keep the war going because our economy depended on continuing the charade that if we don't fight them there we will have to fight them here.
My question has always been, how many Afghans are actually able to come to the US and carry out a mission in the US. Please pay attention to the fact that we are having trouble recruiting and training them just for their own military and the police forces. Most them are illiterate, and functioning just about the mental capacity of an eight year old in the US, a statement I had asked the Guantanamo commander in 2008 to refute on the Jim Bohanan show.
The problem is that we need these wars, to keep our economy going to provide jobs for the people at Boeing, Lockheed Martin, at Dyna Corp, at BlackWater (no called XE) at CSC, and of course at KBR and Halliburton.
Once again one must connect the dots, as I mentioned previously our economy needs the wars to keep going, our wars are fought with borrowed money, and we borrow the money from the same banks that we are loaning money to, to keep them afloat, it does get kinda confusing does it not.
Yesterday I posted a comment on an article on "truth out" and the comment was this "
Mohammed N. Razavi Note, we need to "create" terrorists to control our own population, and need the war to support our economy and transfer wealth from the US government to corporations, banks and private individuals. If you do not understand the connection you need to study up.16 hours ago · · 1 person"
Now I know it sounds unlikely that the US government will create terrorists on purpose, but what if the result of our actions is still the same, on purpose or not. WE NEED WARS. For my younger readers, under Reagan the US government decided that the parts of the US defense could be privatized. When I joined the army in 1976, everyone on base , just about, was in uniform, we did have some civilians but mostly guys in the army, from gate guards to picking up trash to kitchen duty to painting building, and more all was done the GIs, heck we even cut the grass around the BOQ.
Then things started to change, there were contractors in supply, in kitchen and in the motor pools and on and on, millions of civilians now work for the military doing the jobs the GIs once did, ( I have explained else where how it reflect on the civilian employment numbers etc). Now more and more complicated tasks are assigned to civilians ( who make a lot more money than the GIs.
Here in lies the big problem, if we do not have wars, all these people are unemployed and also the corporations who make profits off this will go out of business if we do not have a mission for them. Like I said earlier it all started under Reagan, and of course continued under under Bush 41.
http://www.defense.gov/specials/secdef_histories/bios/cheney.htm
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/20/in-afghanistan-house-speaker-john-boehner-assails-pullout-plan/
LIFE IS A GAME OF CONNECT THE DOTS, IF YOU DON'T CONNECT ALL THE DOTS OR DON'T CONNECT THEM IN THE RIGHT ORDER YOU NEVER GET THE PICTURE
No comments:
Post a Comment